|
Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 16 post(s) |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2210
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 08:11:00 -
[1] - Quote
Mr Epeen wrote:Except for Chribba's brief remarks, I see that most web hosts are strangely quiet on this. And for good reason. If the more mouth frothing anger management deficient among you get your way and CCP decides you are right that any income is RMT, say goodbye to your kill boards, news sites, blogs, market sites and character sheets. Anything that relies on click-throughs and affiliates to cover hosting costs. Be careful what you wish for, people. You might just get it. Mr Epeen  There is a huge difference between having an affiliate link on a fansite and giving players an isk reward for using that link. The difference is RMT, and it is what separates what other sites do from what SOMERblink did. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2210
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 08:16:00 -
[2] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Out of curiosity.
For all you folks gathering the pitchforks and torches and learning to tie ropes into nooses. Do you expect a single or mass execution? Just Somer or Somer and staff or Somer staff and anybody who has ever done business with them?
damn, that includes me.
Or if you are heading the mob towards CCP are you looking for the one person mentioned in the 'email leak' or their entire staff or (as some of you love to ask for) the entire senior management team of CCP for allowing this to take place? Community and CSM thrown in for good measure, no doubt.
damn I made the list again
How much blood, how many bodies do you need to satisfy your craving for justice?
After all, as the queen once said . . . `Sentence first--verdict afterwards.'
I am not apologizing for CCP, just reminding some that this is not an instantaneous kind of thing. But some of you want to skip sentence, verdict, and leap straight to the execution(s) so anything I say to delay that must be stonewalling and sucking up to my masters.
I'm not quite sure where you're getting all that from, but it's not a verdict or judgement I'm more interested in at the moment. I think most people understand that this will take some time to resolve, but I would very much like to know what CCP's stance on it was in the first place. Did they give permission to SOMER as claimed on the site, or is this something that CCP definitely still does classify as RMT? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2214
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 10:10:00 -
[3] - Quote
Tipa Riot wrote:I read Somer's proposal text in full (linked on his site) and if you do, it's pretty obvious IMO that the wording and order of given information is intentionally misleading. Furthermore the claimed intention (provide a service to players to ease in game PLEX selling) makes no business sense in combination with a negative ISK fee unless you include the real money part.
BUT what if the scheme is altered to give out the Jita sell price -1 Mio in fees for the service? Then it would become RMT with a bad exchange rate. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2214
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 10:46:00 -
[4] - Quote
Tipa Riot wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:Tipa Riot wrote:I read Somer's proposal text in full (linked on his site) and if you do, it's pretty obvious IMO that the wording and order of given information is intentionally misleading. Furthermore the claimed intention (provide a service to players to ease in game PLEX selling) makes no business sense in combination with a negative ISK fee unless you include the real money part.
BUT what if the scheme is altered to give out the Jita sell price -1 Mio in fees for the service? Then it would become RMT with a bad exchange rate. Somer is the receiver of the real money hence it's actually a better rate for them. ... and the benefit looks still strong enough to encourage people to buy PLEX through their affiliation program. Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2221
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 11:10:00 -
[5] - Quote
Tipa Riot wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:Yes...and it would still be RMT, and thus not allowed by CCP rules. Or so I would have thought a few days ago, at any rate. Sure, but without a clear ISK-valued benefit for the consumer there would be not much difference anymore to any other 3rd party service being financed through CCP's affiliate program and player's ISK donations. You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2227
|
Posted - 2014.08.19 11:40:00 -
[6] - Quote
Tipa Riot wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:You're missing the point. It is classified as RMT because SOMER is exchanging an in-game service (PLEX buying) for an out-of-game payment (using their referral link). This means they're trading in-game services for real-world currency which is the definition of RMT. So does for example Dotlan ...it's an valuable in-game service financed also through a GTC/PLEX buying link. Although, as I stated earlier, this is a more indirect connection it still generates real money from an in-game service. To be clear, I'm not defending Somer/Markee, but I would consider it a challenge to formulate clear rules which do not harm all the other presumably non-profit services. Again, you're missing the point. None of the services Dotlan provides are in return for clicking their link. Those referral links are not the problem, giving people isk for using them is. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2294
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 00:51:00 -
[7] - Quote
CCP Falcon wrote:Mr Epeen wrote:Jake Rivers wrote: Of course they are a one time redeemable code, but was sommerblink buying back the code, or making the player redeem his code and transfer a plex via contract to sommerblink? If sommerblink was simply buying the plex code, this could be used over and over again.
Well, since Falcon said that's not the case you can put it to bed now and find another conspiracy to champion. Mr Epeen  I like your shades. I need to get me some of those.  Come to the dark side.  |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2294
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 01:03:00 -
[8] - Quote
Just to throw my own opinion into the ever-widening ring...
I don't think that with SOMERblink shutting down the issue is settled or resolved. Other than any appropriate punishments as determined and meted out by CCP, I think the real issue here is the ambiguity in the third part policies governing what is and isn't allowed in third party development. As someone who's been trying to get into it, that ambiguity has by far been the largest barrier of entry. The complete mess of official information on the subject is so far scattered throughout blog posts, official articles, wiki entries, and year after year of dev forum posts that it is next to impossible to get clear, unequivocal answers to even some of the most basic questions.
And I don't mean to imply that there is no effort being made by CCP on the matter. I know CCP Foxfour and Falcon, for example, have been extraordinarily active and helpful in the community, but it seems that they badly need reinforcements. If CCP wants to help prevent something like this from happening again the first step would be a clear, official source of centralized information regarding the third party development rules and regulations. All of the ambiguity surrounding the rules as they stand is just a recipe for 'workarounds' and 'clever manipulation' of the rules that could potentially result in more instances of RMT or other rule-breaking such as this one. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2296
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 02:30:00 -
[9] - Quote
Ralk Orin wrote:Well I took a year break from EVE and the only reason I kept one account up was to play blink and set some skills. I am sad to see Blink go the way of the Dodo. I did get the remainder of my isk I had deposited with them back.
I understand his reasoning for shutting down the site, the witch hunt that is this investigation and community uproar and calling for Somer's head.
I think now that GTC's have been removed and plex can only be sold at CCP's price they need to remove all third party suppliers. and just have CCP as the only source of plex. that would pretty much prevent this from happening again. It is my understanding that this issue has very little to do with third party suppliers and everything to do with one individual offering an in-game incentive to use a referral link. Just because the referral link was for the purchase of PLEX does not mean that all PLEX sales by every third party has anything to do with the issue. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2298
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 02:45:00 -
[10] - Quote
Cherry Yeyo wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:Ralk Orin wrote:Well I took a year break from EVE and the only reason I kept one account up was to play blink and set some skills. I am sad to see Blink go the way of the Dodo. I did get the remainder of my isk I had deposited with them back.
I understand his reasoning for shutting down the site, the witch hunt that is this investigation and community uproar and calling for Somer's head.
I think now that GTC's have been removed and plex can only be sold at CCP's price they need to remove all third party suppliers. and just have CCP as the only source of plex. that would pretty much prevent this from happening again. It is my understanding that this issue has very little to do with third party suppliers and everything to do with one individual offering an in-game incentive to use a referral link. Just because the referral link was for the purchase of PLEX does not mean that all PLEX sales by every third party has anything to do with the issue. The guy was out of line, everybody recognized it last year and then they basically deceived a VP at CCP into signing off on the same thing this year. Incentives to use his button rather than anyone elses It's an important distinction to make though that incentives by themselves are not a bad thing, only when they involve in-game items or services (in this case trading PLEX for higher than market price). |
|

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2300
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 03:13:00 -
[11] - Quote
Rroff wrote:Sentient Blade wrote:Let's be realistic, regardless of what the CCP verdict was on this case, SOMER was never going to be allowed to survive. The community demanded their pound of flesh, and that's what they got. Although some won't be happy until people have been burnt at the stake. Sadly seems to be a fair amount of "can't manage to become a success so can't stand to see others become a success" behind a good bit of the attacking of somer, don't really know enough about what somer does behind the scenes as to whether they were in the wrong or not or brought it on themselves or not but have noticed the efforts some have gone to in an effort to bring somer down with poorly hidden agendas of their own. If you don't know enough about what SOMER did to have so many people upset then perhaps you should read through the thread and find out before accusing those in it of having nefarious agendas. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2302
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 03:16:00 -
[12] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:n the same respect however, we believe that the promotion that caused this issue was not representative of the original proposal that was brought to CCP. Spin spin spin spin spin. You make me sad, CCP. He stuck his **** so far up your ass that you couldn't see straight. Now let's watch the PLEX market unravel. Besides being incredibly inappropriate, all I see in your comment is a quote of a reasonable statement supported by SOMER's own document and declaring it to be "spin". In what way is Falcon twisting or mincing words in that comment? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2303
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 03:36:00 -
[13] - Quote
Sion Kumitomo wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:n the same respect however, we believe that the promotion that caused this issue was not representative of the original proposal that was brought to CCP. Spin spin spin spin spin. You make me sad, CCP. He stuck his **** so far up your ass that you couldn't see straight. Now let's watch the PLEX market unravel. Not to be impolite, but are you stupid? Falcon is being more polite here than I would be because Somer's proposal that he gave CCP isn't actually what he did. Go read the document Somer sent them. Pay particular attention to the "no bonus isk" bit and the subtle weasely last line that betrays his actual intent. It's not spin, it's reading comprehension. Come back when you get some. To play devil's advocate here (and to be clear, I am in no way condoning the post you quoted) Somer's proposal should never have been approved in the first place because the bonus isk isn't what makes this a case of RMT, it is the fact that an in-game service was being offered for using the referral link. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2322
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 04:34:00 -
[14] - Quote
Cameron Freerunner wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:Cameron Freerunner wrote:CCP Falcon wrote:n the same respect however, we believe that the promotion that caused this issue was not representative of the original proposal that was brought to CCP. Spin spin spin spin spin. You make me sad, CCP. He stuck his **** so far up your ass that you couldn't see straight. Now let's watch the PLEX market unravel. Besides being incredibly inappropriate, all I see in your comment is a quote of a reasonable statement supported by SOMER's own document and declaring it to be "spin". In what way is Falcon twisting or mincing words in that comment? You can't seem to divorce Falcon the person from Falcon the CCP representative. He has the unfortunate task of being the community punching bag (do your duty, sir, we in the corporate world understand your position all too well). Somer scammed CCP and they let themselves be scammed. They were so interested in selling PLEX, they chose not to see the forest for the trees. Go back to being clueless, Derrick. This part of the game is so meta, its off the ******* charts. CCP Falcon is the community liaison, and I'm willing to bet that nowhere in his job description is 'sit there and be punched'.
It does appear that CCP messed up in this case but so far the only real evidence of that is the text file and statement Somer made on his own site that CCP approved it, which hardly constitutes unbiased evidence. Before unleashing your righteous indignation at CCP, perhaps you should wait for the full story.
This isn't "meta", it isn't a part of the game at all. It seems like it is a clear violation of the rules for third party developers and the reaction was quick and even included doing their best to keep the community informed. Seems like the only clueless one here is you. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2327
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 04:45:00 -
[15] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:the talk about the proposed plan has been too hard and fast for me... will someone break it down nice and slow, Barney style please. I want to understand it the way other people seem to, but I still don't see it. (help plz) The written proposal Somer linked on his site you can find here.
What basically ended up happening is Somer offered to buy the PLEX bought through their affiliate link with Markee Dragon at a markup of the current Jita price. Thus the RMT: using their referral to buy PLEX and then giving you more isk for said PLEX. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2348
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 05:51:00 -
[16] - Quote
Rain6637 wrote:SOMER's games are consistent in generating more ISK than he puts into them.
people in this thread have pointed out SOMER is not a charity... so outside of the closed loop of SOMER games that simply generate more ISK, what do you suppose he should do with his ISK besides finding reasons to give it away and promoting his site and [CCP's revenue via] PLEX in the process?
if you don't think of something, the ISK would only accumulate.
even if SOMER became an ETC reseller, that still leaves the question of what to do with that ISK outside the closed loop of SOMER games.
I can't think of anything that makes more sense than what he's done... can you? I can think of quite a few things to do with the isk if simply giving back to the community was the primary desire. The point was, the deal involved trading isk for an out-of-game service which is clearly against CCP rules. Do you really think there is no other method to give away isk? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2348
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 05:56:00 -
[17] - Quote
Andski wrote:Tear Jar wrote:Imagine that I ran a software company and had a ton of isk. Based on the current rules, I could totally pay people isk to write code for me, which I then sell on the market. Mittani does that, but instead pays people isk for writing and webhosting. This is a ridiculous edge case and you'd probably be in violation of the law if you did this, as you don't have the right to redistribute software that you buy. Additionally, TMC pays for their own web hosting in RL $$, and the articles they pay ISK for are all related to CCP IP, conforming to guidelines CCP handed down to them after last year's Somergate. The difference is that they haven't tried to weasel their way around it by deceiving CCP. Actually you can redistribute software that you buy, provided the license set by the seller allows for it (and paying someone to make software often enables one to dictate such a license). However, doing so with material created for Eve, which is the exception that allows for code to be purchased with isk, would constitute a violation of the EULA. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2357
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 06:53:00 -
[18] - Quote
Ohkewl wrote:RubyPorto wrote:Ohkewl wrote:You say you represent the players but that is a lie. You might represent the 50 or so loudmouths here, but there are far more players that use the blink website, and you sure arent representing them. You just showed how valuable the CSM is. The only reason Blink is down is that Somer threw a hissy and turned it off when his RMT scheme came to light. How does Somer's hissy become the CSM's fault, exactly? The only one who really knows why is Somer. A wild guess, some people are allowed to RMT from CCP, and others arent. Sounds pretty wild to me, I'm pretty sure CCP doesn't allow RMT in any form. Unless you're redefining the term. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2361
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 07:02:00 -
[19] - Quote
Tao Dolcino wrote:I have played EVE since 2003 with different accounts. Each time there have been a scandal because of CCP i have cancelled my subscription for many months to protest. I have lost all trust in CCP years ago (Incarna was the final nail in the coffin). If they again play it "blurry mafia" instead of being clear and straight, i will cancel again, but this time for good. I'd better pay 15Gé¼ monthly to people who have a minimum of sense of probity. By the way, CCP, i'm also watching you on the matter of null sec sov, which for me is another form of mafia issue. A mafia issue? Don't you think accusing CCP of running an organized crime syndicate might be a bit extreme? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2363
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 07:20:00 -
[20] - Quote
Ohkewl wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:Ohkewl wrote:...
The only one who really knows why is Somer. A wild guess, some people are allowed to RMT from CCP, and others arent. Sounds pretty wild to me, I'm pretty sure CCP doesn't allow RMT in any form. Unless you're redefining the term. RMT= converting ISK to real money. That's what Somer, Evenews24 and TMC are doing, they jump thru some hoops to get there, but the end result is the same. Those "hoops" are the rules CCP has put into place for all third party developers to abide by. It's pretty clear that Somer is the one who broke them, which is the whole reason this thread exists. |
|

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2363
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 07:21:00 -
[21] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:Ohkewl wrote: You say you represent the players but that is a lie. You might represent the 50 or so loudmouths here, but there are far more players that use the blink website, and you sure arent representing them. You just showed how valuable the CSM is.
I wonder if neighbourhood junkies complain when the local dealer is arrested. m Not really helping your case. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2365
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 07:36:00 -
[22] - Quote
Andski wrote:Fracoix wrote:People like me who bought PLEX to blink will  I expect i wasn't alone in doing this.... Thankfully, the National Council on Problem Gambling has a 24-hour confidential support hotline you can call. Get help here: http://www.ncpgambling.org/ If that was a joke, it was in poor taste. If it wasn't, I don't think spending money on gambling alone constitutes an addiction to gambling. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2368
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 08:28:00 -
[23] - Quote
Remiel Pollard wrote:Klyith wrote:Remiel Pollard wrote: I don't care about Somer one way or the other, but if you were a victim of an unsubstantiated witchhunt, it'd probably be easier for you to just disappear, don't you agree?
Nah. If I was the victim of a witchhunt, I'd probably stand firm to my convictions in the belief that all the evidence would vindicate me. That would be fine, provided the crowd didn't kill you first based on circumstantial assumption, bias, and the fact that they just never liked you to begin with. Hyperbole aside, do you really think the investigation CCP started is unsubstantiated? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2373
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 09:07:00 -
[24] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:K1ng Splurge wrote:I love how everyone is demanding justice!!!
Justice to you idiots would be Somer being banned, in turn banning every user who took part in Somerblink for bonus rewards and or "the new plex system" basically crippling eve online because 50% of users in eve played blink at some point. Last I remember hearing, CCP's policy towards ISK buyers is to remove the ISK and warn them on the first event. ISK sellers are the only ones who get the instant perma-banhammer. Also, Blink advertised the RMT scheme as CCP approved. That lie from a formerly reputable source reduces the level of responsibility the buyers have. Somer did advertise it as CCP approved, but that seems to have been confirmed by Falcon's comment regarding Somer's actions not being in line with the proposal. What isn't known is exactly what CCP approved. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2374
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 09:23:00 -
[25] - Quote
Andski wrote:K1ng Splurge wrote:But how is that fair towards Somer? I thought CCP was fair and just in their pursuit in RMT?
Surely banning somer or the punishment should be equal to those who took part?
You basically saying, its ok if we all beat someone to death but only he who actually lays the final blow counts for punishment?
"the people who took part in this by taking advantage of the bonus shouldn't be banned because it'd be unfair but here's why they should be banned to make it fair" "I have an unfortunate habit of attributing fake quotes to people." |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2374
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 09:38:00 -
[26] - Quote
Adrie Atticus wrote:This thread is the sole reason USA needs military vehicles for their police forces... Really? I mean, I just... really? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2375
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 09:52:00 -
[27] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Myriad Blaze wrote: 1) I just read the proposal again to be sure: For what's it worth Somer followed it to the letter, meaining you are wrong.
2) The proposal is neither vague nor misleading. Even if it were, it would be in CCPs responsibility to ask about anything they think is unclear before agreeing to the proposal. Meaning you are wrong again.
3) Are you sure the VP of sales is not the person to go through with this? If she isn't shouldn't SHE know this better than anyone else and provide the correct person(s) to talk to? And if she isn't yet continues to talk to Somer as if she were, why do you believe that Somer knew better? I don't think you got this right either.
Proposal wrote:Justification: Blink provides no extra ISK or bonus Blink credit for buying through the link *AHEM* 50m over sell orders that is available if and only if you buy through the link is: "extra," it's "ISK," and it's "for buying through the link." i.e. exactly what Somer promised not to do. 3) Why wouldn't Somer go to the community team who they have talked to many times before? Why go to someone far less likely to be well versed in the nuances of EVE? It looks like Somer clearly overstepped the bounds of the agreement, but to be fair that proposal should never have been given the green light. Even if it was followed to the letter it still constitutes RMT. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2375
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 10:02:00 -
[28] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:It looks like Somer clearly overstepped the bounds of the agreement, but to be fair that proposal should never have been given the green light. Even if it was followed to the letter it still constitutes RMT. If it was offered at Jita buy prices, or even (at a stretch) sell prices, it would be fine. Somer would have actually been providing a "let me be your Jita alt" service. But then that's not a particularly good incentive since Jita alts are so ubiquitous, so Somer wouldn't have stood to make nearly as much money. It's not the buyback program in principle that's the problem, it's the premium Somer was paying to encourage purchase through the affiliate link. (And a buyback program would be a horrible pain to keep on the right side of RMT because of constant market fluctuations.) I have to disagree with this. RMT is not just defined by making a profit, it's the trade of any in-game items, services, or currency for out-of-game items, services, or currency. Trading the services of a Jita alt for the use of their referral would still constitute RMT. |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2379
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 10:16:00 -
[29] - Quote
RubyPorto wrote:Derrick Miles wrote:I have to disagree with this. RMT is not just defined by making a profit, it's the trade of any in-game items, services, or currency for out-of-game items, services, or currency. Trading the services of a Jita alt for the use of their referral would still constitute RMT. I'm assuming that Somer was truthful when he said this: Proposal wrote:This is a service, in keeping with CCP's new guidelines that ETC affiliate link rewards should be service-oriented. Indicating that CCP is OK with providing services as affiliate link rewards. Whether that's good policy or not, I'm not sure. You have a point there, I assumed that line was a bit of marketing wordsmithing. I'm not aware of any new policy or guidelines regarding affiliate links, do you happen to know what that's in reference to? |

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2393
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 11:17:00 -
[30] - Quote
James Amril-Kesh wrote:"This medic has saved hundreds of lives. We should definitely overlook the fact that he beats his wife."
Jonah Gravenstein wrote:He's getting hammered because he attempted to circumvent the rules regarding the monetisation of CCPs intellectual property.
His charitable donations do not excuse that, just as they didn't excuse Bernie Madhoff when he got clobbered for running a huge Ponzi and ripping people off for their pensions. While RMT is bad, I'm not sure it rates on the scale of wife-beating and stealing pensions. |
|

Derrick Miles
EVENumbers
2395
|
Posted - 2014.08.20 11:27:00 -
[31] - Quote
Thanks for the update. |
|
|
|